Monday, June 08, 2009

Sensitivity Measurements - Bjarne's Receivers

I’ve owned a few receivers over the years. I’ve measured the MW sensitivity on most of them, and on one I borrowed.

Receiver

500 kHz

1000 kHz

1500 kHz

Telefunken E-1501[1]

-108 dBm

-112 dBm

-112 dBm

Racal RA6790/GM

-108 dBm

-109 dBm*

-109 dBm

EAC R-390A

-116 dBm

-116 dBm

-112 dBm**

JRC NRD-525

-112 dBm

-114 dBm

-115 dBm

Icom IC-R75[2]

-111 dBm

-111 dBm

-110 dBm

Icom IC-746Pro[3]

-112 dBm

-112 dBm

-111 dBm

Icom IC-703[4]

-110 dBm

-113 dBm

-113 dBm

Icom IC-7000

-102 dBm

-109 dBm

-111 dBm

Icom IC-R1500

-96 dBm

-96 dBm

-96 dBm

Etón E1

-112 dBm

-114 dBm

-115 dBm

SDR-IQ

-101 dBm

-101 dBm

-101 dBm

Perseus[5]

-105 dBm

-103 dBm

-104 dBm

QS1R/QS1R ext.preamp[6]

-93 dBm/-105 dBm

-94 dBm/-105 dBm

-95 dBm/-106 dBm

*Measured on 1100 kHz. On 1000 kHz there was a tone (spurious signal?) that prevented measurements.

** Surprisingly low. Measurements on 1400 and 1600 kHz showed -114 dBm sensitivity.

All measurements made with 400 Hz tone, 30% modulation on AM with AGC off and "wide" bandwidth (nominal 6 kHz except RA6790/GM; nominal around 4.5 kHz, and Etón E1, nominal around 7 kHz).

And the winner is… not very surprisingly, the EAC R-390A, but with the NRD-525 a very close second. At most locations, sensitivity is not always an issue. But at my location, sensitivity certainly is. The 525 is no more in my possession, but the R-390A will stay.

The SDRs lack a few dB to be up front, but they have other virtues. There will never be a perfect radio.


[1] Attenuation pad removed below 1.6 MHz

[2] Fully Kiwa-modified

[3] Attenuation pad below 1.8 MHz removed, and preamp enabled

[4] Attenuation pad below 1.8 MHz removed

[5] Preamp on/off, dither off, preselector off. Other settings give less sensitivity. 500 kHz reading actually 800 kHz.

[6] A Wellbrook, 11 dB (nominal) preamp was put in the signal path to compensate for the QS1R not having an internal preamp (unlike the other receivers)

No comments: